Ask HaloDeal 0412 · 1,024 × H100
Responding · stress test
Stress this deal: next-gen a quarter early, rents fall 40%
get_deal(0412)run_stress(0412, rents −40%, next-gen −3m)
It breaches. Collateral falls from $21.72m to $17.79m, so loan-to-value rises from 67.8% to 82.7%, past the 75% covenant.
Debt service cover holds at 2.58× against a 1.15× floor. This is a collateral problem, not a cash-flow one.
Check next: the residual value method, 53% of the range and unchecked.
Ask HaloDeal 0412 · 1,024 × H100
Showing data · which method to trust
The methods disagree. Which one has been right?
get_deal(0412)get_track_record()
At maturity they are 17 points apart. Against resale sales, only one has held up:
Market-implied23%94% within 10 pts
List price − haircut35%50% within 10 pts
Accounting40%0% within 10 pts
Halo weights them 60 / 28 / 12 by that record, not by habit.
Check next: why accounting still carries 12% weight.
Ask HaloDeal 0412 · 1,024 × H100
Reading the news · counterparty risk
What does today’s CoreWeave news mean for this loan?
get_counterparty_events(0412)
CoreWeave · 14 Oct 2026
Unsecured notes traded near 14.8–14.9% yields, shares fell 16%, S&P rating B+.
Source: investingLive; CoreWeave Q2 results
If 0412’s tenant were CoreWeave, value falls $1.66m and debt cover slips from 2.58× to 2.53×.
That is tenant credit, not rent. A rent futures hedge would not cover it.
Check next: tenant concentration across the book before the Q3 marks.